Remote Sensing for Wind Power Generation | ||
INTRODUCTION Siting Wind Turbines Remote Sensing OVER SEA OVER LAND ON SITE WIND POWER
Web site created
by E-mail comments and suggestions to pmkelly@prodigy.net. Last updated 4/24/2002.
|
ON SITE Mini-SODAR SODAR is limited by several factors: the attenuation of sound over distance, environmental noise at the received frequencies, and precipitation, which yields a higher backscatter signal. It can return estimates of wind speed and direction for every 5 m of height over its vertical range. Mini-SODAR deploys the SODAR technology in a small, transportable system, approximately 1.2 x 1.2 m. Its vertical range is lower than larger SODAR systems, usually 20 to 200 m rather than 50 to 500 m. the published specifications on AeroVironment's Model 4000 mini-SODAR are,
Maximum
Altitude: 200 meters A list of mini-SODAR manufacturers is available on the ISARS web site. Research Programs In 1999, Ecofys Energy and Environment conducted a 3-month study to determine the suitability of mini-SODAR for wind energy siting . Conducted at ECN’s wind turbine test site in the Netherlands, the study found that SODAR-estimated wind speeds were approximately 4 percent less than anemometer data (after filtering of data contaminated by rain noise and the operation of a nearby wind turbine). The study identified a need to establish appropriate settings for signal-to-noise filtering and noted that, while mini-SODAR could be obtained “off-the-shelf,” data analysis and interpretation required significant time and understanding of the technology. A paper published earlier this year compared mini-SODAR to anemometer data from KNMI’s 213 m mast in Cabauw, Netherlands. It found that mini-SODAR-reported wind speeds varied from the mast’s anemometer by +1 to –1.5 m/s. The same paper projects comparative costs for mini-SODAR and construction of a mast for anemometer readings. It estimates that mini-SODAR becomes more cost-effective once mast heights reach 80 m or more. It is noted that three years ago, wind turbines were typically 60 m high. Today they are often 120 m. The breakeven point will be even less if the evaluation site is off-shore, where mast construction costs are significantly higher. “SODAR: een doorbraak in kosten en vergunningprocedure?” is available in Dutch. While accuracy is a key concern for site evaluation, the cost comparison may make mini-SODAR the technology of choice as turbine heights increase—especially for off-shore locations. |